Friday, January 18, 2013

Americans go to Mexico for a cheaper perfect smile


Americans go to Mexico for a cheaper perfect smile
By Reuters Health
February 1, 2008 -- CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico (Reuters) Feb. 2 It was fear of the hefty bill as much as fear of the drill that kept American musician Don Clay away from U.S. dental clinics for 30 years.
When a sorely infected tooth eventually drove him to the dentist last month, it was to a clinic in a Mexican border city better known for violent crime and drug cartels.
Shrugging off concerns about hygiene and Mexico's brutal drug war, thousands of Americans are heading to Ciudad Juarez and other Mexican border cities for cheap dental treatment.
"I had to get my teeth fixed. I need a perfect smile to make a successful career in music. Treatment in the United States is so pricey," said Clay, a Texan trying to get a record deal as a hip-hop artist.
U.S. dental treatment costs up to four times as much as in Mexico, making it tough for uninsured Americans to treat common problems such as abscessed teeth or pay for dentures.
A dental crown in the United States costs upward of $600 per tooth, compared to $190 or less in Mexico.
Aspiring Mexican dentists are moving to border cities in droves and are luring American patients away from farther flung discount destinations such as Hungary and Thailand.
Americans have long crossed the border for cheap medicines, flu vaccines, eye surgery or specialist doctors, but dentists are now in highest demand.
Dental clinics are on almost every block in central Ciudad Juarez, ranging from dingy dives to clinics that look more like posh hair salons. Getting there involves dodging prostitutes, drug pushers, and cowboy-boot sellers.
BARGAIN-HUNTING
"We've gone from a handful of patients when we started 2.5 years ago to 150 new patients a month," said Joe Andel, an American who owns the Rio Dental clinic in Ciudad Juarez with his Mexican dentist wife, Jessica.
Rio Dental, which uses U.S. labs to make its crowns, picks patients up at the airport in El Paso, Texas, across the border and has treated people from as far away as Alaska and Hawaii.
"The Internet makes this possible. It allows patients to find us and research us and shows we can do dental work of equal or superior quality to the United States," Andel said.
Internet bloggers swap stories and compare notes about Mexican dentists, but it always comes down to money.
Dentistry in the United States has become prohibitively expensive for some patients, with bills that can run to tens of thousands of dollars. Malpractice insurance premiums, operating costs that are much higher than in Mexico and dentists seeking to claw back the rising cost of their tuition all weigh.
Even among Americans who have medical insurance, many find they are not covered for treatment other than the basics, and paying on credit means high interest payments.
"I did $4,000 of dental work in the United States and put it on my credit card. Because of the interest, I only paid off $400 in three years," said a U.S. teacher from New Mexico getting treatment in Ciudad Juarez who gave his name as Bill.
Cosmetic dentistry, which insurers do not cover and which can be paid in dollars in many Mexican border clinics, is also popular, Ciudad Juarez dentist Luis Garza said.
"If you want a perfect smile, you have to pay for it, and we can do it cheaper, that's all," he grinned.
Copyright © 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

California dentists asked to volunteer

California dentists asked to volunteer
By Laird Harrison, Senior Editor
January 17, 2008 -- The California Dental Association (CDA) is asking its members to offer children free "assessments", because so many of the state's kids aren't getting good dental care.
This month, Children Now, a children's advocacy group, gave the state a grade of C- for oral health. And last year, the state began requiring parents to take their kids to the dentist -- or explain the reason why.
"Out of 25 states surveyed, only Arkansas ranked below California in children's oral health," said Gayle Mathe, a spokesperson for the California Dental Association, citing a 2006 report by the Dental Health Association.
For example, 70.1% of California children have tooth decay, and 28.7% have untreated decay, according to the report.
To focus attention on the problem, the state Legislature passed a law, requiring parents to take their kids to the dentist or explain why they didn't. The law, which went into effect January 1, 2007, stirred "a lot of activity" in its first year, said Gayle Mathe, a spokesperson for the California Dental Association (CDA). "It generated a lot of phone calls to our office."
“I think there's a shortage of certain kinds of dentists.”
— Kelly Hardy, associate director for
     health, Children Now
She notes that some other states, including Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Illinois, have similar programs in place, and that many others are considering them.
Under the law, parents of public school kids must submit a form by May 31 of the year after the child first enters the public school system. The first part of the form must be signed by a dentist or hygienist.
The second part of the form is a waiver that excuses parents for not getting the first part completed. Parents can simply check a box saying that they didn't want to take their kid to the dentist or a box saying that they couldn't find a dental office where their insurance was accepted. They are also asked to indicate which type of insurance or state benefit dentists rejected.
The legislation provided funds for schools to distribute the forms, collect them, and report the data. "We're trying to get specifics on barriers," Mathe said. Some hint of what the numbers might reveal can be found in the 2006 Dental Health Association report, which stated that 16% of those surveyed had trouble getting access to care, primarily because of poverty or lack of insurance.
To help bridge that gap, the CDA is asking dentists to conduct the dental assessments for free for those patients who can't afford to pay. According to the organization's Web site, an "assessment" can fall short of a full examination. It's simply a matter of noting whether there are visible caries or fillings, or any problem that requires urgent treatment. The CDA says parents requesting an assessment -- rather than a standard examination -- should fill out a consent form, available on the organization's Web site, making it clear that their child didn't get thorough inspection.
But dentists shouldn't leave it at that. "You and your office staff have a unique opportunity to educate the parent on the importance of oral health and begin the process of establishing a dental home for this child," the CDA states on its Web site.
Kelly Hardy, associate director for health at Children Now, thinks cost isn't the only reason why kids aren't getting to the dentist: "I think there's a shortage," she said. "Some counties don't have any pediatric dentists."
While she applauds the new legislation as a "first step," she argues that more should be done, including more money for dental care and efforts to get even younger kids to the dentist.
In a separate report, Children Now cited a survey finding that 58 counties in California reported a shortage of dentists.
There is some good news, though. California children's teeth actually improved between 1994 and 2005, according to the Dental Health Foundation.
Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Is Invisalign dangerous for generalists?


Is Invisalign dangerous for generalists?
By Laird Harrison, Senior Editor
December 5, 2007 -- So you've taken a course on Invisalign and now you think you can straighten teeth. Maybe so. But watch out. These high-tech plastic aligners may not work as well as old-fashioned braces...in which case there could be a lawyer in your future.
That's the word from Daniel Kuncio, D.D.S., a New York orthodontist, and his colleagues at the Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx. The team compared the teeth of 11 patients treated with Invisalign to 11 treated with conventional braces three years after the two groups had finished their treatments. They found that the Invisalign patients' teeth had relapsed significantly more than the patients using traditional braces.
"The take-home message is that you have to be very careful with this product," says Dr. Kuncio, whose study was published in the September issue of Angle Orthodontics. "It's easy to get into trouble." Kuncio should know. He was called as an expert witness in the malpractice trial of a general dentist accused of botching an orthodontic treatment with Invisalign. He warns that many such lawsuits could crop up soon as more and more general dentists begin using Invisalign.
"The take-home message: be very careful with this product"
Introduced in 1999, the system caught on fast, partly because it requires less expertise and less training than conventional braces, opening the world of orthodontics a bit to general dentists. Dentists simply make impressions of their patients' teeth, then send them to Invisalign's creator, Align Technology of Santa Clara, Calif. Technicians at the company use computer modeling to create a set of clear plastic aligners, each designed to move teeth a little bit farther in the desired direction.
Invisalign is popular among patients because the transparent, removable aligners are much less noticeable and more comfortable than conventional braces, says Robert L. Boyd, D.D.S., M.Ed. chair of orthodontics at the University of the Pacific in San Francisco. Hundreds of thousands of patients have received Invisalign treatment, and because of its appeal, the technique is expanding the market for elective orthodontic treatment, he says.
But how effective is it? While no one disputes that the aligners can move teeth, experts debate which kinds of problems it can fix and which kinds should be treated using conventional techniques. Dr. Boyd, a paid board member and shareholder in Align, has published several studies describing the advantages of Align over traditional orthodontics. For example, he points to unpublished research showing that Invisalign patients experience less root resorption than conventional orthodontics patients.
And Dr. Boyd argues that general dentists can and should be using Invisalign -- in fact, his school is teaching the procedure to general dentistry students. He has also published research suggesting orthodontists can use it for fairly complex procedures.
But independent researchers have found Invisalign wanting. A review of Invisalign studies published in the April 2007 Journal of the Canadian Dental Association concluded, "Achieving similar results to those of more conventional fixed appliances may be difficult."
The only two clinical trials comparing Invisalign to traditional braces reached similar conclusions. First came a Sept. 2005 retrospective study in the American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics. The investigators compared 48 patients immediately after treatment with Invisalign to 48 patients immediately after treatment with braces, using American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Phase III examination criteria. Twenty-seven percent fewer Invisalign patients had passing scores.
Now comes Dr. Kuncio's work using the ABO system to score the teeth after three years. "What I saw in my research was that Invisalign relapsed more," he says.
Dr. Boyd dismisses these results. "There is a bit of negativity out there," he says. "Whenever you get into something new, there is at least a third of the old guard who will hate it just because it's new." He calls Dr. Kuncio's study "biased," arguing that the investigators just didn't like Invisalign. And he says the study was "poorly done" because the orthodontist treating the two groups of patients, Clarence E. Shelton, Jr., was much more experienced with braces than with Invisalign.
Dr. Kuncio responds that he and his colleagues do like Invisalign. "I use it everyday," he says. He also acknowledged that it would have been more ideal to compare patients treated by an orthodontist equally well-practiced in both techniques. But he points out that the two groups had equivalent ABO scores immediately post treatment.
He argues that Align should market Invisalign to orthodontists rather than general dentists because general dentists don't know what to do if they get into trouble. Orthodontists, by contrast, can fall back on conventional techniques. For those general dentists who do want to try Invisalign, he recommends extreme caution. "Start slow with simple cases," he says.
And in the end, that's where the two experts agreed. "Don't start with anything but the simplest cases," echoes Dr. Boyd. He also advises treating only patients over 14 and only those patients who are truly motivated. "Cooperation is the number one issue," he says.

Dental care? What, me worry?


Dental care? What, me worry?
By DrBicuspid Staff
December 5, 2007 -- Nearly 40 million adults in the U.S. report that they lack access to adequate healthcare. Almost 20 percent say they cannot afford dental care, prescription medicines, mental health care, or eyeglasses. No, this isn't from the script for a "Sicko" sequel. Rather, these are sobering statistics gleaned from "Health, United States, 2007," the annual report on the nation's health released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
"There has been important progress made in many areas of health such as increased life expectancy and decreases in deaths from leading killers such as heart disease and cancer," said CDC Director Julie Gerberding, M.D., M.P.H in a press release. "But this report shows that access to health care is still an issue where we need improvement."
Some notable highlights about Americans' dental health:
  • In 2005, 25 million adults did not get dental care because they could not afford it.
  • One-fourth of children between the ages of 2-17 did not visit the dentist in 2005. Of these children, those living below the poverty line were more likely to lack dental care.
  • In the same year, about one-half of adults living below the poverty line did not make a single visit to the dentist.
  • In some good news, the report noted that, "between 1988-1994 and 2001-2004, approximately one-quarter of adults 20-64 years of age had untreated dental caries, down from nearly one-half in 1971-1974."
The report cites cost of care, difficulty in navigating government assistance programs, finding a local dentist who accepts Medicaid, language/cultural barriers, and lack of insurance as some of the problems associated with accessing proper dental care.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Science journals take on poverty


Science journals take on poverty

October 25, 2007 -- The Council of Science Editors (CSE) organized a Global Theme Issue on poverty and human development on Oct. 22, with 235 science journals from 37 countries simultaneously publishing more than 750 articles on the topic.
"The goal of the CSE Global Theme Issue is to stimulate interest and research in poverty and human development and disseminate the results of this research as widely as possible," according to a press release by the Council of Science Editors.
Several dental journals participated in the effort. A guest editorial in the Journal of Dental Research highlighted the dental problems plaguing the poor.
"Caries in adults and children, acute oral viral infections and noma, oral lesions of HIV/AIDS, periodontal diseases, craniofacial and dental developmental defects, and oropharyngeal/salivary gland neoplasms occur largely unchecked in resource-poor nations," the editorial noted. "It is clear that much of the global burden of oral disease affects the poor and neglected segments of humanity in both rich and poor countries."

Study: Cancer treatment causes caries


Study: Cancer treatment causes caries

October 25, 2007 -- Radiation therapy for thyroid cancer can cause long-term dental disease, researchers at the University Hospital in Basel Switzerland report in this month's Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
Previous research showed that zapping thyroids with high doses of radioiodine damages salivary glands, often leading to sialadenitis and xerostomia. So the investigators contacted 176 patients who had undergone this treatment over the previous three decades and asked them and their dentists about the health of their teeth.
This graph shows the dramatic increase in tooth extractions after radiation therapy for thyroid cancer. Copyright © by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc. From "The Dental Safety Profile of High-Dose Radioiodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Longitudinal Cohort Study," by Martin A. Walter, et al., Journal of Nuclear Medicine 48: 1620-1625.
They found that these patients were 98.8 percent more likely to have caries after the radiation than before it. And they were 8.14 percent more likely to have a tooth extracted for every gigabecquerel of radioiodine they had received.
So what can be done? First, the investigators suggest, only those patients who could benefit most from radioiodine therapy should undergo it. Second, patients who have had this therapy should take precautions above and beyond normal hygiene: they should be careful to avoid dehydration; they should try glandular massage to preserve their saliva flow; and they should be cautious with anticholinergic drugs, which can also cause xerostomia.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Cosmetic confidential


Cosmetic confidential

October 23, 2007 -- The dark truth behind those bright smiles
Ah, for the glamorous life of a cosmetic dentist. No more bratty kids or cranky codgers filling up the waiting room. No more extractions, fillings, or root canals. You'll spend your afternoons bleaching Lindsay Lohan's teeth or straightening Ashton Kutcher's smile. Who knows? You could end up with your own "Extreme Makeover"-style reality TV show.
Before you decide enter into the realm of pure aesthetics, though, take heed. We've drilled deep inside the world of cosmetic dentistry, peeled off its thin veneer and revealed the decay beneath.
OK, maybe that's overstating it a bit. But we have talked to some of the top dental professionals in the country and got the inside skinny on the booming world of cosmetics. Bottom line? It's not as easy as it looks or as profitable as it seems (more on that later).
Part I: So you wanna be a cosmetic dentist
You may be a whiz with an explorer and a root canal ace, but the differences between general dentistry and aesthetic dentistry are more than cosmetic. Success demands skills that often reside outside the comfort zone for many general dentists. Here are some keys to success.
Choose your lab carefully. Your work will only be as good as the lab you partner with, so pick a good one -- or more than one. Surveys by the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentists (AACD) show that 8 out of 10 dentists use multiple labs, often a cheaper one for basic treatments and higher-end techs for cosmetic work.
"Dentists really need to shop around for the right lab," said Laura Kelly, who holds the distinction of being both the first woman and the first nondentist to be named president of the AACD. A ceramist by trade, she knows quality cosmetic dentistry requires close collaboration between GDs and techs. "You need to make sure their skill level mirrors where you want to go with your practice, you share the same philosophy, and speak the same language."
And once you've got a lab you like, work hard to maintain a good relationship. When they've done a good job, show them the "after" pictures and send a little sugar their way, Kelly said. "Too often the ceramist only hears when adjustments need to be made," she said. "Smart dentists will call them up and say, 'Hey thanks, you really made me look good.' You can make a technician's month with just one phone call."
Polish your shutter skills. Being good with a handpiece is essential to being a successful cosmetic dentist. But how good are you with a Nikon or an Olympus? No patient will engage you without first checking your portfolio. If your shots are out of focus, over- or underexposed, or simply unattractive, you won't gain their trust -- no matter how good you are. You'll also want to bring your photos when you visit a new lab, so they can understand the standards of work you expect. One step in the right direction: Take a dental photography class (the AACD offers some).
"I see photographs in dental journals and I'm embarrassed for my profession," said Dr. David Landau, an accredited member of the AACD who operates a private practice in San Diego. "The teeth look fake, the gums look red or washed out instead of pink and healthy, and the exposure is so off you can't tell the chroma and value of the porcelain. As a member of the AACD, one of the first things you learn is how to be an excellent clinical photographer."
Beware trouble patients. Some people just can't be pleased -- and they're definitely not the ones you want coming to you for cosmetic work. One leading aesthetic practitioner who asked to remain anonymous tells the story of a woman who came into his office looking for extensive cosmetic work.
"The first thing she tells me is how her plastic surgeon 'butchered' her," he said. "Then she showed me a line over her eye that I couldn't see. The use of the word 'butchered' was a real warning sign that she had expectations no dentist in the world could possibly fulfill." He ultimately declined to take on the case.
"As an aesthetic dentist, you think 'I can do that,' but if you haven't read the patient well, it will cost you a lot of time and money," he added.
Avoid Dumbell U. Cosmetic dentistry isn't an ADA-accredited specialty, but continuing education in cosmetic techniques is a must for any general dentist stepping into this realm. "The technology develops so quickly that if you don't take courses every year you'll fall behind," warned Dr. Dan Nathanson, professor and chairman of the department of restorative sciences and biomaterials at Boston University. Just be careful about what that continuing education course really qualifies you for.
For example, taking a week-long course in occlusion doesn't mean you're able to perform complex prosthodontic procedures. "Some graduates get a false sense of security about their ability to do these things," he said. "If we could teach you to be a prosthodontist in a week, we wouldn't be offering a three-year degree."
General dentists who want to improve their skill set in cosmetic dentistry should look for courses associated with the local chapters of the AACD, American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (AAED), or a university linked to those organizations. One example is Boston University (Nathanson is a director of the AAED); another is UCLA, where Dr. Brian LeSage, director of its Aesthetic Continuum, is also an AACD fellow.
Beware the malpractice monster. When it comes to patient lawsuits, you're three times as likely to get sued over crown and bridge work than dentures or surgical extractions, according to surveys by the ADA. But focusing on cosmetic dentistry doesn't guarantee you'll get sued less. It could make you a bigger target.
"Whenever you are dealing with the very subjective opinions of patients [getting cosmetic procedures], you risk displeasing them," noted attorney Frank Recker, an attorney and dentist in Marco Island, FL. "And an unhappy patient generally poses a greater risk of suit in my view, whether meritorious or not."
The best way to avoid legal jeopardy is to ensure that your patients understand everything that's involved in the procedure, and that you understand what the patient is expecting you to deliver, Landau said. (See "Beware trouble patients" above.)
Know when to call for backup. As a general dentist, you can perform virtually any procedure a specialist could -- but you probably shouldn't. If you get bitten by the malpractice monster, you'll be held to the standard of care typically provided by a board-certified specialist. Knowing which cases are too complex or exceed your skillset not only saves you money in the long run, it's also better for the patient.
"Different general dentists have different comfort zones," Landau said. "Sometimes to get to the ideal gum position you have to move the gum without moving the bone, which any dentist can do. Sometimes you have to move the gum and the bone, which some GDs wouldn't feel comfortable with. If you have to replace an anterior tooth with an implant, you're probably best referring it out to a specialist who understands the demands of making an implant look like a natural tooth erupting out of the gums."
But understanding the patient's cosmetic needs requires a trained eye, he said. "You need to understand what a natural healthy gum line should look like. A lot of general dentists don't know what they don't know."
"So much of what we do these days is in concert with cosmetic dentists, we're almost like a team," said Dr. Donald Joondeph, a professor emeritus of orthodontics at the University of Washington who operates a private practice in Bellevue. "The GD, orthodontist, periodontist, prosthodontist, oral surgeon -- each of us has his own role to play. We all look at the case and plug in to make the end product the best it can be."
One example, Joondeph said, would be a missing tooth that requires an implant. "Let's say a person had an upper lateral incisor congenitally absent and the adjacent teeth have drifted into the space making the space too small for an implant," he said. "A 'team' would then be required: an orthodontist to align the teeth and open the space where the tooth was missing, making the space the same size as the one on the opposite side; a periodontist or oral and maxillofacial surgeon to place the implant; and the general dentist to place the crown."
Get accredited. If you're serious about aesthetics, the AACD offers an accreditation program, but getting your sheepskin is no trivial task. Dentists must pass a written exam, then submit five patient cases over five years to a board of reviewers who evaluate each case on 50 separate criteria, and then pass an oral exam. Only a very small percentage of the dentists achieve accreditation within the five-year window the AACD allows. To become an accredited fellow (42 worldwide) requires a far more rigorous examination of clinical ability. The Academy of Comprehensive Esthetics (ACE), likewise has a tough certification program.
Just remember that the benefits are largely personal -- cosmetic dentistry is not an ADA board-certified specialty. Getting that sheepskin doesn't mean you'll automatically be able to charge more for your services, either. And many dentists who lack the AACD credential still do excellent work, saidDr. Larry Addleson, an accredited fellow and past president of the AACD who operates a private practice in San Diego. "But you can know for sure that those who become accredited are capable of performing at a high level."
Part II: Where's the money?
OK, here's the part of the story you've been waiting for. Is cosmetic dentistry your road to riches?
On one hand, pay for dentists has never been better. According to surveys conducted by the ADA, average annual salaries for dental practitioners rose from $166,000 in 2000 to nearly $186,000 in 2004. The number of cosmetic procedures rose 12.5% over roughly the same period, according to surveys conducted by the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD).
Ipso facto, cosmetics must good for your bottom line, right?
Not necessarily. While dental incomes are rising -- and cosmetic procedures certainly add to the kitty -- the main reason dentists make more money is that the ratio of dentists to the general population has been dropping since the 1980s, according to Boston University's Nathanson. There are more sick teeth and relatively fewer people to fix them.
Another limiting factor is insurance. Purely cosmetic treatments, such as veneers or teeth whitening, are generally not covered by insurance. That means patients must foot the bill themselves or finance the work through third parties like CareCredit or Dental Fee Plan (a Capital One credit card used to pay for dental work). Nearly 82% of dentists offer third-party financial help, according to the AACD.
The good news for dentists is that instead of getting paid a percentage of your fees by a PPO or insurance plan, you'll usually get paid in full, said Dr. Charles Blair, a practice management consultant in Charlotte, NC, and author of Coding with Confidence: The "Go-To" Guide for CDT-2007/2008.
The bad news: cosmetic dentistry is more sensitive to fluctuations in the market. When the national economy hits a tailspin, everyone has fewer reasons to smile -- or to pay $500 to whiten their teeth.
The inconvenient truth? "If you're doing cosmetic dentistry right, you're probably not making a lot of money," said Dr. Larry Addleson. For one thing, doing it right means using higher quality -- and more expensive -- labs.
"You can get a crown or veneer made in an offshore lab for $100, or you can pay a master ceramist $600," he said. "If the veneer costs you $100 and you charge the patient $800, you can make more money. But you can't charge six times as much for a $600 veneer and expect to remain competitive."
You must also be willing to send things back to the lab for a do-over -- or several do-overs -- until you and the patient are satisfied. Whether dentists can recoup the added costs depends on their relationship with both the lab and their patients, Kelly said, but the same market rules apply.
"You have to be willing to reject things that most dentists would say are beautiful," said Dr. David Landau. "When a cosmetic case comes back from the lab we call it a 'first fitting,' not delivery of the final product. Every time you do a fitting and reject the work, you lose money."
Doing it right means also taking more time to work with patients, especially when dealing with complex cases. It can mean spending more time and money for continuing education, and paying more for qualified staff.
Cosmetic dentists also incur greater advertising costs, according to Blair. "Pure cosmetic dentists typically spend 7% to 10% of their gross on advertising, versus around 1% for most general dentists," he said.
In his 25 years of consulting, Blair said he's seen a handful of GDs give up bread and butter dentistry and focus entirely on cosmetic work, but few end up sticking with it.
"Some people have walked the plank, gotten out of the PPOs and regular insurance plans, and tried to specialize only in cosmetics," he said. "But I've seen some stumbling there. Many have had to run back to general dentistry. I caution dentists to maintain their bread and butter practice and let cosmetics be the gravy."
For dentists like Addleson, money isn't the motivator. It's about raising the overall quality of dental work for his community as a whole -- one reason why he's a director of the San Diego Advanced Study Group and currently mentoring 10 dentists in his area.
"If you're really committed to cosmetic dentistry, you're not going to get rich," he said. "It's an inner passion. Yesterday doesn't matter. You're only as good as what you do today. It's like trying to understand why Van Gogh cut off his own ear. It's hard for people who don't share this passion to understand."
Freelance writer Dan Tynan prefers his dentists at a distance -- preferably over the phone.