Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Science journals take on poverty


Science journals take on poverty

October 25, 2007 -- The Council of Science Editors (CSE) organized a Global Theme Issue on poverty and human development on Oct. 22, with 235 science journals from 37 countries simultaneously publishing more than 750 articles on the topic.
"The goal of the CSE Global Theme Issue is to stimulate interest and research in poverty and human development and disseminate the results of this research as widely as possible," according to a press release by the Council of Science Editors.
Several dental journals participated in the effort. A guest editorial in the Journal of Dental Research highlighted the dental problems plaguing the poor.
"Caries in adults and children, acute oral viral infections and noma, oral lesions of HIV/AIDS, periodontal diseases, craniofacial and dental developmental defects, and oropharyngeal/salivary gland neoplasms occur largely unchecked in resource-poor nations," the editorial noted. "It is clear that much of the global burden of oral disease affects the poor and neglected segments of humanity in both rich and poor countries."

Study: Cancer treatment causes caries


Study: Cancer treatment causes caries

October 25, 2007 -- Radiation therapy for thyroid cancer can cause long-term dental disease, researchers at the University Hospital in Basel Switzerland report in this month's Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
Previous research showed that zapping thyroids with high doses of radioiodine damages salivary glands, often leading to sialadenitis and xerostomia. So the investigators contacted 176 patients who had undergone this treatment over the previous three decades and asked them and their dentists about the health of their teeth.
This graph shows the dramatic increase in tooth extractions after radiation therapy for thyroid cancer. Copyright © by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc. From "The Dental Safety Profile of High-Dose Radioiodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Longitudinal Cohort Study," by Martin A. Walter, et al., Journal of Nuclear Medicine 48: 1620-1625.
They found that these patients were 98.8 percent more likely to have caries after the radiation than before it. And they were 8.14 percent more likely to have a tooth extracted for every gigabecquerel of radioiodine they had received.
So what can be done? First, the investigators suggest, only those patients who could benefit most from radioiodine therapy should undergo it. Second, patients who have had this therapy should take precautions above and beyond normal hygiene: they should be careful to avoid dehydration; they should try glandular massage to preserve their saliva flow; and they should be cautious with anticholinergic drugs, which can also cause xerostomia.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Cosmetic confidential


Cosmetic confidential

October 23, 2007 -- The dark truth behind those bright smiles
Ah, for the glamorous life of a cosmetic dentist. No more bratty kids or cranky codgers filling up the waiting room. No more extractions, fillings, or root canals. You'll spend your afternoons bleaching Lindsay Lohan's teeth or straightening Ashton Kutcher's smile. Who knows? You could end up with your own "Extreme Makeover"-style reality TV show.
Before you decide enter into the realm of pure aesthetics, though, take heed. We've drilled deep inside the world of cosmetic dentistry, peeled off its thin veneer and revealed the decay beneath.
OK, maybe that's overstating it a bit. But we have talked to some of the top dental professionals in the country and got the inside skinny on the booming world of cosmetics. Bottom line? It's not as easy as it looks or as profitable as it seems (more on that later).
Part I: So you wanna be a cosmetic dentist
You may be a whiz with an explorer and a root canal ace, but the differences between general dentistry and aesthetic dentistry are more than cosmetic. Success demands skills that often reside outside the comfort zone for many general dentists. Here are some keys to success.
Choose your lab carefully. Your work will only be as good as the lab you partner with, so pick a good one -- or more than one. Surveys by the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentists (AACD) show that 8 out of 10 dentists use multiple labs, often a cheaper one for basic treatments and higher-end techs for cosmetic work.
"Dentists really need to shop around for the right lab," said Laura Kelly, who holds the distinction of being both the first woman and the first nondentist to be named president of the AACD. A ceramist by trade, she knows quality cosmetic dentistry requires close collaboration between GDs and techs. "You need to make sure their skill level mirrors where you want to go with your practice, you share the same philosophy, and speak the same language."
And once you've got a lab you like, work hard to maintain a good relationship. When they've done a good job, show them the "after" pictures and send a little sugar their way, Kelly said. "Too often the ceramist only hears when adjustments need to be made," she said. "Smart dentists will call them up and say, 'Hey thanks, you really made me look good.' You can make a technician's month with just one phone call."
Polish your shutter skills. Being good with a handpiece is essential to being a successful cosmetic dentist. But how good are you with a Nikon or an Olympus? No patient will engage you without first checking your portfolio. If your shots are out of focus, over- or underexposed, or simply unattractive, you won't gain their trust -- no matter how good you are. You'll also want to bring your photos when you visit a new lab, so they can understand the standards of work you expect. One step in the right direction: Take a dental photography class (the AACD offers some).
"I see photographs in dental journals and I'm embarrassed for my profession," said Dr. David Landau, an accredited member of the AACD who operates a private practice in San Diego. "The teeth look fake, the gums look red or washed out instead of pink and healthy, and the exposure is so off you can't tell the chroma and value of the porcelain. As a member of the AACD, one of the first things you learn is how to be an excellent clinical photographer."
Beware trouble patients. Some people just can't be pleased -- and they're definitely not the ones you want coming to you for cosmetic work. One leading aesthetic practitioner who asked to remain anonymous tells the story of a woman who came into his office looking for extensive cosmetic work.
"The first thing she tells me is how her plastic surgeon 'butchered' her," he said. "Then she showed me a line over her eye that I couldn't see. The use of the word 'butchered' was a real warning sign that she had expectations no dentist in the world could possibly fulfill." He ultimately declined to take on the case.
"As an aesthetic dentist, you think 'I can do that,' but if you haven't read the patient well, it will cost you a lot of time and money," he added.
Avoid Dumbell U. Cosmetic dentistry isn't an ADA-accredited specialty, but continuing education in cosmetic techniques is a must for any general dentist stepping into this realm. "The technology develops so quickly that if you don't take courses every year you'll fall behind," warned Dr. Dan Nathanson, professor and chairman of the department of restorative sciences and biomaterials at Boston University. Just be careful about what that continuing education course really qualifies you for.
For example, taking a week-long course in occlusion doesn't mean you're able to perform complex prosthodontic procedures. "Some graduates get a false sense of security about their ability to do these things," he said. "If we could teach you to be a prosthodontist in a week, we wouldn't be offering a three-year degree."
General dentists who want to improve their skill set in cosmetic dentistry should look for courses associated with the local chapters of the AACD, American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (AAED), or a university linked to those organizations. One example is Boston University (Nathanson is a director of the AAED); another is UCLA, where Dr. Brian LeSage, director of its Aesthetic Continuum, is also an AACD fellow.
Beware the malpractice monster. When it comes to patient lawsuits, you're three times as likely to get sued over crown and bridge work than dentures or surgical extractions, according to surveys by the ADA. But focusing on cosmetic dentistry doesn't guarantee you'll get sued less. It could make you a bigger target.
"Whenever you are dealing with the very subjective opinions of patients [getting cosmetic procedures], you risk displeasing them," noted attorney Frank Recker, an attorney and dentist in Marco Island, FL. "And an unhappy patient generally poses a greater risk of suit in my view, whether meritorious or not."
The best way to avoid legal jeopardy is to ensure that your patients understand everything that's involved in the procedure, and that you understand what the patient is expecting you to deliver, Landau said. (See "Beware trouble patients" above.)
Know when to call for backup. As a general dentist, you can perform virtually any procedure a specialist could -- but you probably shouldn't. If you get bitten by the malpractice monster, you'll be held to the standard of care typically provided by a board-certified specialist. Knowing which cases are too complex or exceed your skillset not only saves you money in the long run, it's also better for the patient.
"Different general dentists have different comfort zones," Landau said. "Sometimes to get to the ideal gum position you have to move the gum without moving the bone, which any dentist can do. Sometimes you have to move the gum and the bone, which some GDs wouldn't feel comfortable with. If you have to replace an anterior tooth with an implant, you're probably best referring it out to a specialist who understands the demands of making an implant look like a natural tooth erupting out of the gums."
But understanding the patient's cosmetic needs requires a trained eye, he said. "You need to understand what a natural healthy gum line should look like. A lot of general dentists don't know what they don't know."
"So much of what we do these days is in concert with cosmetic dentists, we're almost like a team," said Dr. Donald Joondeph, a professor emeritus of orthodontics at the University of Washington who operates a private practice in Bellevue. "The GD, orthodontist, periodontist, prosthodontist, oral surgeon -- each of us has his own role to play. We all look at the case and plug in to make the end product the best it can be."
One example, Joondeph said, would be a missing tooth that requires an implant. "Let's say a person had an upper lateral incisor congenitally absent and the adjacent teeth have drifted into the space making the space too small for an implant," he said. "A 'team' would then be required: an orthodontist to align the teeth and open the space where the tooth was missing, making the space the same size as the one on the opposite side; a periodontist or oral and maxillofacial surgeon to place the implant; and the general dentist to place the crown."
Get accredited. If you're serious about aesthetics, the AACD offers an accreditation program, but getting your sheepskin is no trivial task. Dentists must pass a written exam, then submit five patient cases over five years to a board of reviewers who evaluate each case on 50 separate criteria, and then pass an oral exam. Only a very small percentage of the dentists achieve accreditation within the five-year window the AACD allows. To become an accredited fellow (42 worldwide) requires a far more rigorous examination of clinical ability. The Academy of Comprehensive Esthetics (ACE), likewise has a tough certification program.
Just remember that the benefits are largely personal -- cosmetic dentistry is not an ADA board-certified specialty. Getting that sheepskin doesn't mean you'll automatically be able to charge more for your services, either. And many dentists who lack the AACD credential still do excellent work, saidDr. Larry Addleson, an accredited fellow and past president of the AACD who operates a private practice in San Diego. "But you can know for sure that those who become accredited are capable of performing at a high level."
Part II: Where's the money?
OK, here's the part of the story you've been waiting for. Is cosmetic dentistry your road to riches?
On one hand, pay for dentists has never been better. According to surveys conducted by the ADA, average annual salaries for dental practitioners rose from $166,000 in 2000 to nearly $186,000 in 2004. The number of cosmetic procedures rose 12.5% over roughly the same period, according to surveys conducted by the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD).
Ipso facto, cosmetics must good for your bottom line, right?
Not necessarily. While dental incomes are rising -- and cosmetic procedures certainly add to the kitty -- the main reason dentists make more money is that the ratio of dentists to the general population has been dropping since the 1980s, according to Boston University's Nathanson. There are more sick teeth and relatively fewer people to fix them.
Another limiting factor is insurance. Purely cosmetic treatments, such as veneers or teeth whitening, are generally not covered by insurance. That means patients must foot the bill themselves or finance the work through third parties like CareCredit or Dental Fee Plan (a Capital One credit card used to pay for dental work). Nearly 82% of dentists offer third-party financial help, according to the AACD.
The good news for dentists is that instead of getting paid a percentage of your fees by a PPO or insurance plan, you'll usually get paid in full, said Dr. Charles Blair, a practice management consultant in Charlotte, NC, and author of Coding with Confidence: The "Go-To" Guide for CDT-2007/2008.
The bad news: cosmetic dentistry is more sensitive to fluctuations in the market. When the national economy hits a tailspin, everyone has fewer reasons to smile -- or to pay $500 to whiten their teeth.
The inconvenient truth? "If you're doing cosmetic dentistry right, you're probably not making a lot of money," said Dr. Larry Addleson. For one thing, doing it right means using higher quality -- and more expensive -- labs.
"You can get a crown or veneer made in an offshore lab for $100, or you can pay a master ceramist $600," he said. "If the veneer costs you $100 and you charge the patient $800, you can make more money. But you can't charge six times as much for a $600 veneer and expect to remain competitive."
You must also be willing to send things back to the lab for a do-over -- or several do-overs -- until you and the patient are satisfied. Whether dentists can recoup the added costs depends on their relationship with both the lab and their patients, Kelly said, but the same market rules apply.
"You have to be willing to reject things that most dentists would say are beautiful," said Dr. David Landau. "When a cosmetic case comes back from the lab we call it a 'first fitting,' not delivery of the final product. Every time you do a fitting and reject the work, you lose money."
Doing it right means also taking more time to work with patients, especially when dealing with complex cases. It can mean spending more time and money for continuing education, and paying more for qualified staff.
Cosmetic dentists also incur greater advertising costs, according to Blair. "Pure cosmetic dentists typically spend 7% to 10% of their gross on advertising, versus around 1% for most general dentists," he said.
In his 25 years of consulting, Blair said he's seen a handful of GDs give up bread and butter dentistry and focus entirely on cosmetic work, but few end up sticking with it.
"Some people have walked the plank, gotten out of the PPOs and regular insurance plans, and tried to specialize only in cosmetics," he said. "But I've seen some stumbling there. Many have had to run back to general dentistry. I caution dentists to maintain their bread and butter practice and let cosmetics be the gravy."
For dentists like Addleson, money isn't the motivator. It's about raising the overall quality of dental work for his community as a whole -- one reason why he's a director of the San Diego Advanced Study Group and currently mentoring 10 dentists in his area.
"If you're really committed to cosmetic dentistry, you're not going to get rich," he said. "It's an inner passion. Yesterday doesn't matter. You're only as good as what you do today. It's like trying to understand why Van Gogh cut off his own ear. It's hard for people who don't share this passion to understand."
Freelance writer Dan Tynan prefers his dentists at a distance -- preferably over the phone.

OPINION: Dear New York Times: The answer isn't more dentists


OPINION: Dear New York Times: The answer isn't more dentists

October 23, 2007 -- In all the heated debate about the New York Times' recent controversial piece, "Boom Times for U.S. Dentists, But Not for Americans' Teeth," some basic history and economic realities have been ignored.
The boom in the number of dentists in the 1970s (my generation) didn't result in more people getting dental care. Back then, the federal government said we didn't have enough dentists. The result was a glut of dentists and less business for dentists all the way around. It took years to work off the oversupply.
Now the government is saying the same thing. But if we've learned anything, increased availability of a service doesn't necessarily increase utilization. If people can't pay for a service, they won't use it. And if people don't want to pay for a service, they won't value it, either.
The real problem is that federal and state medical assistance programs aimed at helping the underprivileged (and even the lower-middle class) don't come close to covering a dentist's overhead. Are dentists expected to provide medical care at a loss, to essentially subsidize dental care for those who can't afford it? I can't help but agree with Dr. Terry D. Dickinson, the executive director of the Virginia Dental Association, when he said, "Charity is not a healthcare system."
If dental care is truly important (and I wouldn't be a dentist if I didn't think it was), then we all need to step up to the plate -- Congress, state legislatures, and yes, taxpayers. Everyone should contribute to making dental healthcare available to the people most in need. Like attorneys, dentists do plenty of pro bono work. But ultimately, they have to make a living, too.
In Wisconsin, where I practice, the Marshfield Clinic is working with the Family Health Center to set up rural dental clinics to provide care to underserved patients.The only downside? The group doesn't cover Medford, where I practice. (More than 9% of the local population lives below the poverty line, including nearly 13% under the age of 18.) What makes this program possible? Federal grants, higher Medicare and Medicaid compensation, state grants, and more. If the government appropriately reimbursed dentists for their services, there'd be plenty of access to dental care for Americans of all economic stripes. There wouldn't be a need for dental "therapists."
Dentists are healers -- compassionate, civic-minded men and women who are dedicated to helping their fellow citizens. But we're not doormats. It's up to our elected representatives -- who, to date, have shown little backbone -- to tackle the inequities in American healthcare, and to come up with the bucks to make it happen.
Kim Gowey, D.D.S., practices in Medford, WI. He is a past president of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry. He was on the continuing education faculty of Howard University School of Dentistry's Implant Maxicourse, and Baylor College of Dentistry.
Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

New drug can 'revolutionize' oral and maxillofacial surgery


New drug can 'revolutionize' oral and maxillofacial surgery

October 22, 2007 -- Infuse Bone Graft -- a drug used in orthopedic procedures that stimulates stem cells to form bone -- has recently been approved by the FDA for dental use.
The drug consists of two parts: a solution containing rhBMP-2 (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2) and the ACS (absorbable collagen sponge). It can be highly useful in oral and maxillofacial procedures. Surgeons at the School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University have successfully used Infuse to do reconstruction surgery on gunshot and trauma victims, as well as patients with cleft palates and oral cancer.
Until recently, surgeons harvested bone needed for reconstruction surgery from the patient's own hip or ribs. "This is painful, and requires a second surgery site [on the patient]," said Philip Boyne, D.M.D., M.S., D.Sc., professor emeritus of oral and maxillofacial surgery at Loma Linda, in a press release. Infuse can eliminate this entire process from oral and maxillofacial reconstruction surgery.
"The cleft palate cases are particularly rewarding," Dr. Boyne said. "This new drug makes a second surgery unnecessary and the bone generated from the patient's own stem cells forms bone that beautifully completes the natural arch. And the sponge doesn't have to be removed -- it is eventually absorbed by the body."
Infuse can be used in many areas of dentistry and will save patients considerable time and money. For example, cleft palate cases can be an outpatient procedure, saving insurers as much as $15,000, according to Dr. Boyne.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Work less, earn more? One dentist explains how


Work less, earn more? One dentist explains how

October 22, 2007 -- William Blatchford, D.D.S., had a successful practice but he wasn't truly happy. He worked five days a week, never had time for vacations, and always felt a cloud of stress hanging over him. One night while eating leftovers from yet another office dinner, his wife and fellow dentist, Carolyn, said, "We're eating the leftovers of the practice's revenues every month." One night, Blatchford had a realization: He needed to change the entire way he ran his business.
Once he did, Blatchford claims he eventually climbed to the top 1 percent of highest-grossing dentists nationwide. Then he founded Blatchford Solutions and became a coach and consultant to 2,500 dental practices. His selling point: Life is too short, so develop a practice that allows you the lifestyle you desire. When he is not flying planes; skiing near his Bend, Oregon home; or sailing in Puget Sound; Blatchford spreads the word about his theory.
Dr. William Blatchford
His "Show Me the Money" session at the recent ADA conference in San Francisco was a few years in coming. "Two years ago, the ADA told me not to talk about profit or use the 'S-word' at the conference." (We're assuming he meant "sell".) "This year, they actually requested I do this program. It shows how far the dental business has come."
One of his seemingly contrary discoveries: Customer service demands that you focus on income. "People want to go to a dentist who is profitable. They don't want a dentist working on their teeth who is preoccupied with paying the rent."
Cut back on overhead
What keeps dentists from boosting profits? They're bad at estimating what to expect to gross every month, says Blatchford. "A dentist has one month that's shockingly big and assumes it will always be like that and spends money on more staff and equipment. The next month, business goes back to normal and he's worrying about paying expenses. What did the dentist do to make that one month so big? Chances are, they don't know.
"Your 'range of predictability' shouldn't go up and down. It should become narrower."
In Blatchford's case, he scrutinized his staffing. He had 16 employees, five solely for hygiene. ("What does one dentist need 16 employees for?") He laid off three hygienists ("The worst day of my career"), then later cut his total staff to eight. A year later, he grossed slightly more than the prior year, even with half his staff.
Blatchford boasts that his clients gross between $2 to $3 million annually, even when working with staffs of five or fewer. More telling? His dentists work 3.5 days a week and take eight to 10 weeks vacation a year. All of them have cut their overhead and reduced their staff to a handful. "It's not about time spent or efforts made, or even how much you work. It's about results."
Getting there means cutting the small stuff, focusing on high-end treatments, and developing specialized niches. One of Blatchford's clients moved his dental practice to Florida and focused on cosmetic dentures and implants for the abundant population of well-heeled seniors. The dentist charges $6,000 to $10,000 a pop. The results: He went from grossing $800,000 a year to $2 million, with half his previous overhead (a team of five employees), and a four-day workweek.
Another client only works three mornings a week, but she focuses on dentures and implant-supported dentures in a Polish neighborhood in Chicago. "She doesn't do fillings or see kids," says Blatchford. "But she earns so much in her specialty that she throws in a spare set of dentures for free." She likewise trimmed staff, cutting overhead from 63 percent to 37 percent, and grosses $1 million annually.
Typically, 30 percent of a dentist's overhead is staff. Blatchford says it should be 12 to 20 percent. But pay those staffers you keep well--double their salaries. "I once hired someone incompetent and then had to hire a trainer to help her. That's stupid." Hire the most competent staff, give them incentives of higher pay and a reduced workweek, and they'll give you hard work and loyalty in return.
Focus on your top clientele
Blatchford is a firm believer that the top 20 percent of patients generate 80 percent of your income--and that the bottom 20 percent can actually be an income drain. "It's ludicrous to treat all patients the same when some are actually costing you money."
He suggests you create a spreadsheet of all your patients and how much they spend, then list them in descending order of expenditures. "When the descending total hits 80 percent of total income, study those people in that range. Look at their age, gender, and treatments needed -- that's your target market. Get rid of the bottom 20 percent."
Raise fees, lower receivables
Don't be afraid to raise fees, either. Blatchford actually recommends doubling them. "People go to my Chicago-based client because her dentures cost twice as much. They perceive it as quality."
If you're hesitant to double, add the bill cost to your current fee. "Then you can send work to the best lab around, because the patient is paying for it directly."
Accounts receivables are poison in his book. Say you have $100,000 in A/R on Jan.1. Over the course of a year, you'll lose $6,000 through inflation, $10,000 from money you could have invested (if you had it), $36,000 in the costs of trying to get patients to pay, and $24,000 in write-off of bad debts. By year's end, you will have lost $76,000.
"That's why my clients do not carry account receivables," says Blatchford. "It's check, cash or credit card upfront at the desk."
Make treatments affordable by offering financing options from outside sources. Why not?, says Blatchford. "That's how they pay for their car and big-screen TV."
Ply them with services
Consultants often tell dentists to focus on getting more hygiene patients, but Blackford says forget that. "You'll only break even. It will never be a profit center."
Instead, focus on doing more Class II and Class III procedures. "If you do two units of a crown or bridge, your net profit per hour triples." He also recommends offering additional services, such as denture implants, cosmetic dentures, and veneers.
How can you get patients to accept these offerings? "McDonald's made millions by asking, 'Do you want fries with your burger?'" says Blatchford. "Say to your patient during a procedure, 'I notice you'll need an additional crown here soon. We can get both done while you're still numb and save you two extra appointments.'"
Instead of trying to educate patients about treatments' benefits, appeal to their emotions. "People don't want dentures or veneers, they want their teeth to look good, feel good and last a long time. Instead of trying to sell the process, you should be selling the results."
Moneymaking aside, Blatchford emphasizes that all dentists should balance business and pleasure, and ensure that they can incorporate both into their practice. "Life is too short. Make a commitment to be happy. You should say, 'Thank God it's Monday!' Focus only on the things you want to do and enjoy them, both in work and life."

The battle of the power toothbrushes


The battle of the power toothbrushes

October 22, 2007 -- Ultreo, Inc., makers of Ultreo, a power toothbrush based on ultrasound waveguide technology, filed a counter suit against Procter & Gamble in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York last week.
P&G, which makes the Oral-B power toothbrush, filed a suit against Ultreo in September for allegedly misleading consumers and dental professionals through false advertising. According to P&G, Ultreo's claim that their product's ultrasound waveguide technology creates bubbles that fight plaque--that bristle action alone leaves behind--is false. P&G further claimed that one of its studies proved the Ultreo toothbrush was more effective at removing plaque with its ultrasound waveguide technology switched off.
"Ultreo has provided no clinical proof that the ultrasound makes any difference in plaque removal in the mouth. We're taking this action to prevent consumers from being misled and to protect our business," said Dr. Paul Warren, Vice President of Global Oral Care Scientific and Professional Relations for P&G in a press release.
Ultreo has denied these claims in full, and in its countersuit says that P&G is misleading consumers and dental professionals by falsely disparaging Ultreo. Ultreo claims considerable scientific evidence proves its product's advantages, notably a 95 percent reduction of plaque within the first minute of brushing.
"Our marketing focuses on the strong scientific evidence behind Ultreo and the proven consumer preference for the incredible feeling of clean Ultreo provides," said Ultreo CEO and President Jack Gallagher in a press release. "It’s obvious that this is the real source of concern for P&G. The fact that a $76 billion market leader is attacking and disparaging a $3 million startup offering a technological innovation simply validates Ultreo’s acceptance by the marketplace."

Something to smile about


Something to smile about

October 22, 2007 -- October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month and according to the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) five million people are victims of domestic violence in the U.S. every year.
The American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry Charitable Foundation's (AACDCF) Give Back A Smile (GBAS) program provides free dental care to victims of domestic abuse. They restore broken and damaged teeth at no cost to the victim. To date the foundation has treated 600 cases at a total cost of nearly $5 million.
"After suffering abuse, it is difficult for survivors to find something to smile about, and it's even harder when they don't have a smile to show. Time after time we have witnessed AACD members assist survivors of domestic violence by treating their dental injuries, restoring their smiles, their self-esteem and their lives," said AACD Foundation Director Erin Roberts in a press release.
If one of your patients is a victim in need of help, have them call GBAS at (800) 773-4227 and complete the application process. The AACD will connect eligible applicants with a local GBAS volunteer for treatment.

Tooth loss may predict later-life dementia


Tooth loss may predict later-life dementia

October 18, 2007 -- NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Oct. 17 To keep dementia at bay, take care of your teeth. That seems to be the message of a new study in which researchers found a possible link between tooth loss or having very few teeth -- one to nine, to be exact -- and the development of dementia later in life.
The research team analyzed dental records and brain function test results accumulated over 12 years for 144 people enrolled in the Nun Study - a long-term study of aging and Alzheimer's disease among Catholic sisters of the School Sisters of Notre Dame. The participants ranged in age from 75 to 98 years.
Among subjects free of dementia at the first cognitive exam, those with no teeth or fewer than nine teeth had a greater than 2-fold increased risk of becoming demented later in life compared with those who had 10 or more teeth, the researchers found.
Roughly one third of subjects with fewer than nine teeth, or no teeth, had dementia at the first cognitive exam.
Dr. Pamela Sparks Stein of the College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, and associates report their findings in The Journal of the American Dental Association.
A number of prior studies have shown that people who suffer from dementia are more likely than their cognitively intact counterparts to have poor oral health, largely due to neglect of oral hygiene.
The current study is one of only a few that asked: Does poor health contribute to the development of dementia? These results suggest it may, although the Kentucky team cautions that it is not clear from the study whether the association is "causal or casual."
"Common underlying conditions may simultaneously contribute to both tooth loss and dementia," Stein noted in comments to Reuters Health. In addition to gum disease, early-life nutritional deficiencies, infections or chronic diseases that may result simultaneously in tooth loss and damage to the brain, she explained.
Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Dental groups lament SCHIP failure


Dental groups lament SCHIP failure

October 18, 2007 -- Hopes for expanding government-subsidized dental care dimmed Thursday as the House of Representatives failed to override Pres. George W. Bush's veto of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) reauthorization bill.
The override failure sends dental lobbyists back to the halls of Congress where they hope to preserve mandatory dental care in any new version of the legislation.
"We've been asking our grassroots dentists to contact their representatives and support this legislation," William Prentice, director of the American Dental Association's Washington office, told DrBicuspid.com. "We want to make sure that whatever changes they make, they include the dental provisions."
SCHIP provides medical insurance to about 10 million children whose families can't afford the insurance on their own but are too "wealthy" to be eligible for Medicaid. States have the option of using the money to provide dental insurance as well. While all states are currently providing dental care through SCHIP, some have suspended the dental insurance provision in past years when their budgets were tight.
An estimated 40 million children have no dental insurance, and caries is the most common preventable disease among children.
The bill aimed to expand the number of children in the program. In vetoing the legislation, Bush said he wanted to reauthorize the program, but was . But he worried that the bill would include middle class families. "Our goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage, not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage," he told Congress.
Prentice argued that the bill, in fact, would actually have resulted in fewertightened restrictions on relatively wealthy families and more reached out to more poor ones getting subsidized care.
Bush's veto also drew condemnation from the Academy of General Dentists, the American Association of Public Health Dentists, the American Dental Education Association, Oral Health America, and the American Dental Hygienists Association.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Few heart patients need antibiotics


Few heart patients need antibiotics

October 18, 2007 -- Dentists no longer need to prescribe antibiotics to most patients at risk of heart disease, according to a new recommendation by the American Heart Association (AHA).
The new guidelines, published in the October 16 issue of Circulation, revise the broad recommendations for preventative antibiotics the AHA issued in 1997. The earlier guidelines were based on the observation that dental procedures flood the patient's blood with oral bacteria. Researchers worried this bacteria could cause infective endocarditis, a potentially serious infection of the heart's lining.
In revisiting the guidelines, an AHA committee noted that daily activities as routine as brushing your teeth are just as likely as a tooth extraction to send bacteria from the mouth into the bloodstream. And there's no evidence of a dental procedure actually causing infective endocaditis.
But just to be on the safe side, the AHA is keeping its prophylactic antibiotics recommendation in force for patients at the greatest risk of infective endocarditis. That includes those with:
  • Prosthetic cardiac valve or prosthetic material used for cardiac valve repair
  • Previous infective endocarditis
  • Congenital heart disease (CHD)
  • Unrepaired cyanotic CHD, including palliative shunts and conduits
  • Completely repaired congenital heart defect with prosthetic material or device, whether placed by surgery or by catheter intervention, during the first six months after the procedure†
  • Repaired CHD with residual defects at the site or adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or prosthetic device (which inhibit endothelialization)
  • Cardiac transplantation recipients who develop cardiac valvulopathy
The AHA offers a wallet card for these patients describes the recommended antibiotic protocols for various dental procedures.

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

ADA Product Roundup: Goodbye putty, hello lasers, quick Web sites


ADA Product Roundup: Goodbye putty, hello lasers, quick Web sites

October 17, 2007 -- The exhibition floor at the 148th annual ADA convention was bursting with vendors promoting everything from laser tools to latex gloves. Multimedia product demos flashed on mammoth LCD screens, patients gave live testimonials, and wine flowed at the end of the day. As the dental community converged on Moscone Center in windy San Francisco, the DrBicuspid team trolled the aisles, looking for the new, the notable, and sometimes, the offbeat. Some of the highlights:
Cadent's "next generation" iTero.
Say goodbye to putty impressions
Cadent's "next generation" iTero -- unveiled at the show -- is the digital solution for creating precise-fitting dental restorations. Dentists use a handheld intraoral scanner that takes a 3D image of the patient's mouth. You can view the magnified image on a chairside monitor, and make real-time adjustments to it. Once you're satisfied, the image is transferred electronically to a Cadent partner lab. The image is reviewed by the lab and sent to Cadent's manufacturing facility for milling. Cadent sends the completed physical model back to the lab, which creates the final restoration, and delivers it to the dentist. This latest iTero features a shade library and improved background colors and gradients for more realistic and accurate 3D images. It is also 50% faster than its predecessor, when it comes to scanning and displaying an image. Price: $18,000. Availability: Available in 30 states; nationwide in 2008.

Sirona's XIOS Intra-oral Sensor System.
Fast, sharp, easily fit digital x-rays
Need sharp digital imaging -- with sensors that actually fit in a human mouth? Sirona Dental Systems' XIOS Intra-oral Sensor System promises "excellent" image quality, combined with real-time display, thanks to the system's speedy USB 2.0 connections. Communicating with patients and medical professionals is easy -- the XIOS is compatible with SIDEXISA XG imaging software; the DICOM standard is supported. Perhaps just as important, XIOIS' slim, trim, and rounded oral sensors come in two sizes: 25.6 x 36 mm and 20 x 30 mm. Buy the SIDEXIS XG image processing software and you can use it for all the computers in your office. Price: $10,650; $12,500 with SIDEXIS XG software. Availability: Nationwide.
KaVo's GENTLEray 980.
The gentle way to slice gums
The GENTLEray 980 is a new diode laser from KaVo Dental aimed at soft-tissue surgery, from endodontics to treating bacterial infections. The Classic system features a 6 watt, 980 nm laser, 300 µm fibers, foot switch, protective goggles, and a monochrome touchscreen. The Premium version includes new software and greater performance (7 watts cw, 12 watts peak). With both units, the fiber can be replaced with a tooth-whitening handpiece. Better yet, both units feature a touchscreen tutorial. Just pick the procedure and the system pulls up the appropriate instructions and automatically selects the proper settings. Price: TBA after FDA approval. Availability: Available in Europe; awaiting FDA approval in the U.S.
Give your office a makeover
Intimidated by the thought of setting up a new office? Need to give your workplace a facelift? Need to squeeze another operatory into your floor plan? Design Ergonomics can help. The company specializes in designing dental offices that are aesthetically pleasing, ergonomically sound, and make optimal use of your space. Pick the custom design service and you get a design team dedicated to creating a totally personalized office. On a tighter budget? Opt for a range of prefab designs. And if you are simply looking for information about the best material and products to use in a dental office, turn to their design consultation service. Availability: Nationwide.
Prosites' Web site design.
The easy, breezy way to build a Web site
If your jam-packed schedule leaves you no time to get your practice online, let someone else do it. Prosites is a medical and dental Web site design service that offers 43 prefab multipage Web site designs. Each design contains dozens of pages with graphics and professionally written content. You can add pages such as a smile gallery, online appointment request form, information on procedures, FAQs, and more. Prosites lets you edit the content, add pictures and Flash animations, and otherwise customize the site. Simply log onto your password-protected account and create or edit your site with the click of a button. Site need a fresh coat of paint? Choose from Prosite's style options and change to a fresh new look at no extra cost. Price: $2,500 set-up cost. Availability: Nationwide.


DentalEZ's CustomAir by RAMVAC.
Moisture-free, germ-free office
When it comes to keeping bacteria at bay, clean, dry air is a must. DentalEZ Group's new compressor -- the CustomAir by RAMVAC -- could be the solution. According to the company, the CustomAir is quiet, small, and built to run continuously. Thanks to its dual column design, the CustomAir provides a continuous flow of moisture-free air. While one column is purging the air, the other is delivering dry air into the office. Price: $4,350 and up. Available: Nationwide.
Hands-free perio charting
Invented by Dental Hygienist Becky Logue, the Dental R.A.T. is a foot-operated mouse that lets you enter probe readings without the need for an assistant -- or even your hands. Four buttons let you easily enter probe reading numbers; a left-click button lets you control cameras, flip through pages, zoom images, and otherwise run programs. The R.A.T. is compatible with Dentrix, EagleSoft, PracticeWorks, Softdent, PerioExec, and other applications. Plug it into a USB port and you're ready to start charting. List Price: $1395.00. Available: Nationwide.
Dental R.A.T.

The end of cavities? Part I


The end of cavities? Part I

October 17, 2007 -- Maxwell H. Anderson, D.D.S, M.S., M.Ed., doesn't spend much time filling cavities these days. Instead, he's hard at work putting other dentists out of that business.
Dr. Anderson is CEO of C3 Jian, a California start-up that's developing medicines to suppress caries-causing bacteria. And this is just one of many companies around the country working on similar techniques that could send caries the way of polio and small pox. These new treatments would make the classic dentist's business model -- drill, fill, and bill -- as outmoded as ivory dentures.
"Within 10 years, we'll be able to eradicate caries in treatable populations," Dr. Anderson predicts. "But as a dentist, what am I left with?"
Most dentists practicing today won't have to answer that question, says Dr. Anderson. Beingable to eradicate a disease isn't the same as actually eradicating it. Wiping out caries would require treating millions of Americans who don't currently have dental care. So Dr. Anderson expects the change to take place slowly.
But it has already begun and some forward-looking dentists have altered their business model as a result. Advocates of a new approach -- called caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA) -- say dentists can make up for the lost restoration work by attracting patients with the promise of painless prevention.
The revolution has begun
If a cavity-free future sounds like fantasy, consider what has already happened in the past 30 years: the prevalence of decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth among children aged six to 18 fell more than 60 percent, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) found. The trend for other age groups is similarly on the decline.
The likely reason: fluoridation of public water supplies and toothpaste. But most toothpaste contains fluoride and there's only so much drinking water left to fluoridate. So won't the decline in caries level off?
It might, says John Featherstone, M.Sc., Ph.D., dean of the University of California at San Francisco dentistry school, if dentists just keep handing out toothbrushes and lobbying for fluoridated water. But much more is possible.
For starters, dentists haven't exhausted the potential in fluoride. "A little fluoride is good," Dr. Featherstone said. "More fluoride is better." As a 2006 American Dental Association (ADA) panel concluded, fluoride varnishes and gels can go farther than fluoridated water and toothpaste in reducing caries. For example a Cochrane review found that patients getting varnish treatments were 46 percent less likely to need fillings than untreated patients.
And fluoride is only the beginning. Other tools in the caries preventative toolbox include:
  • Antibacterials such as chlorhexidine that kill bacteria that cause caries
  • Sugar-free gum with xylitol that starves bacteria while stimulating beneficial saliva flow
  • Dental sealants that fill in the tooth's fissures and pits preventing decay
  • Patient education to improve diet
  • More frequent exams and cleanings to arrest lesions
  • Applying of calcium phosphate to remineralize enamel
More techniques are in the pipeline, such as vaccines for caries bacteria and laser treatments that may render teeth more resistant to acid. Dr. Anderson's company is working on creating antimicrobial peptides (STAMPS) designed to kill only those organisms -- such as S. mutans -- that cause caries. In theory, other innocuous organisms will fill the niche left by these harmful bugs preventing a new infection.
Along similar lines, Jeffrey D. Hillman, Ph.D., D.M.D., an oral biology professor at the University of Florida, College of Dentistry in Gainesville, is trying to engineer a variety of S. mutans that doesn't produce cavity-causing acid but crowds out the virulent, naturally occurring variety.
Altogether, the prospects for stopping caries look great. But a lot of these measures can be expensive or inconvenient for patients. A 16 oz bottle of 0.12 percent chlorhexidine, for example, sells for about $100 and only lasts a couple of weeks at the recommended twice-a-day dosage.
That's where new diagnostic tools come into play. A growing body of research shows that for some people, a combination of good hygiene and ideal saliva chemistry is enough. For others, swilling chlorhexidine and getting their teeth varnished is a must. And a third group falls in the middle.
Who's next?
Common sense says dentists should concentrate their preventive efforts on those most likely to get caries. But who are they?
The simplest and most obvious way to answer that question is using guidelines based on epidemiological research. Investigators have tabulated data about age, ethnicity, class, filled surfaces, calculus, number of teeth, carious lesions, xerostomia, and a host of other factors, watching to see which ones correlate most closely with caries.
In addition, new assays can estimate the number of caries-causing bacteria in a person's saliva. And electronic devices that can catch caries in early stages are becoming cheaper and more accurate. The Diagnodent (KaVo America) uses a laser to detect the fluorescence of tooth decay. Similar, the D-Carie mini (Neks Technologies), uses light emitting diodes for the same purpose. Other new machines shine light through teeth to create images showing lesions.
With such tools literally in hand, dentists can categorize patients as high, medium, or low risk. "Caries risk assessment and subsequent [management] are what it's all about!" says Martin Davis, D.D.S., a pediatric dentist and associate dean at Columbia University. He argues that high-risk patients should be seen more than twice a year and low-risk patients perhaps every 12 to 18 months.
Since 25 percent of patients get 80 percent of fillings, combining new and old prevention techniques could mean a lot fewer cavities to fill… and a dent in your typical general dentist's wallet.

ADA names new president


ADA names new president

October 16, 2007 -- Mark Feldman, D.M.D, an endodontist from Roslyn, NY, was recently named president of the ADA at a meeting of the ADA House of Delegates held in San Francisco.
"I look forward to leading the ADA's initiatives to improve access to oral health care for children and the vulnerable elderly who are currently underserved," said Dr. Feldman in a press release. "I also want the Association to do everything possible to increase public awareness that oral health is an integral part of over-all health."
Dr. Feldman has held several position of responsibility within the ADA, having served as treasurer, chair of the Council on Insurance, and New York's representative in the House of Delegates. He was also president of the New York Dental Association and Nassau County Dental Association.
Dr. Feldman received his dental degree from Tufts University School of Dental Medicine and completed his specialization at Nassau County Medical Center.
Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

Snake venom speeds healing


Snake venom speeds healing

October 16, 2007 -- A new fibrin adhesive made from an enzyme found in snake venom is more effective at closing surgical incisions than traditional sutures, according to a new study in the October issue of the Journal of Periodontology.
"This unique adhesive may stimulate faster tissue repair...compared to traditional sutures used after surgery," notes study author Monica Barbosa, PhD, Bauru Dental School at the University of Sao Paulo in a press release.
The study looked at 15 patients who had undergone a gingival graft. After 90 days, the mean loss of vertical dimension was greater in the control group (22.33 percent) then the test group using the adhesive (15.66 percent). Also, the test group's grafts were closer to the normal shade of the gingiva in the photographic follow-up 14 days after the surgery.
"This adhesive may be a less infectious alternative to traditional sutures," says Preston D. Miller, Jr., DDS, President of the American Academy of Periodontology, in a press release. "This research highlights the array of therapies available for patients; both traditional and natural alternatives."

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com

ADA Show Report: Whole Body, Whole Lawsuit?


ADA Show Report: Whole Body, Whole Lawsuit?

October 15, 2007 -- SAN FRANCISCO - Is the patient too thin or too fat? Shaky on his feet? Bruised around the neck? If you think that's none of your business, think again. You may be headed for a lawsuit.
Dentists have long recognized and acted on a range of medical problems having little to do with teeth. Now lawyers are exploiting this angle, suing dentists who don’t help with problems as diverse as eating disorders and child abuse.
That was the key message Sunday at a recent seminar at the American Dental Association (ADA) 148th Annual Session held in San Francisco. The session focused on "Failure to Diagnose," a category of malpractice claim that includes not only misdiagnosis but also failing to treat or refer patients when necessary.
"It’s the most important category," said Michael Peterman of Redwoods Group insurance company. "These cases bubble to the top and they're the most expensive for both sides."
Another panelist, Kathleen M. Roman, MS, of Medical Protective insurance company agreed; her company defends its dentist clients successfully in 82 percent of malpractice suits, but only wins 60 percent of "failure to diagnose" cases.
Such cases fall into two broad categories. First, dentists overlook or misinterpret signs of illness. "We all make mistakes," said panelist Philip R. Barbell, DDS, who also works for the Redwoods group. For example, one orthodontist mistook oral cancer for sensitivity to braces. But if the doctor had paid closer attention, he would have noticed that the patient complained repeatedly of the same pain in the same location -- no matter how much wax he put on her braces.
The second type of failure is harder to understand: The dentist accurately diagnoses a problem but ignores it. Why would anyone do this? Sometimes doctors don't want to refer patients because it means sending business to their competition. Other times they just don't communicate well, Roman said.
A fatal mistake
The panel examined several cases that illustrate the legal pitfalls of an incomplete or sloppy diagnosis.
In one example, a migrant worker declined an x-ray before having a damaged tooth extracted, because of the additional expense. The dentist went ahead and pulled the tooth, but the roots were lacerated and the dentist broke the patient's jaw.
The moral of the story, said Peterman? "There is only one standard of care. We can't adjust the standard and say, 'OK, I'm not going to do the x-ray for the migrant worker who can't afford to pay.'"
"The patient cannot dictate the treatment plan," agreed Roman. "Once the dentist has opened a treatment plan, the dentist is obligated to perform the treatment, regardless of the patient's ability to pay."
The patient's signature on an informed consent form might provide some defense for a dentist (see more on this below), as would notes in the patient's chart. "If it's not in the chart, it didn't happen," said Dr. Barbell.
If a patient insists on a course of treatment at odds with standards set by the dentist's state dental board, the dentist should refuse treatment and refer the patient elsewhere, said Roman.
But documentation is only part of the dentist's responsibility, the panel noted. In another case study, a dentist carefully noted signs that a very thin patient might be bulimic. But the dentist never referred the patient to a family doctor who could have confirmed the diagnosis. The patient suffered kidney failure and her family sued the dentist.
In short, said Dr. Barbell, the dentist is responsible for more than just the mouth. "The oral cavity is connected to the rest of the body. If you see a serious medical problem, you are obligated to follow through."
Dr. Barbell advised dentists to look at gait, complexion, and mobility. "Can the patient sit in the chair properly and turn their neck in a certain way? You must train yourself to observe the whole patient."
Sometimes that means asking hard questions. For example, a college student visited his dentist and didn't mention he had been using cocaine. The dentist administered lidocaine and the patient died.
No need for pee or clairvoyance
One way to avoid these problems? Have your staff highlight any questions a patient doesn't answer on a medical form, and refuse treatment until the patient answers those questions. "You have an obligation to be a good clinician, but you don't have to be clairvoyant," said Roman. "You can document that the patient lied."
In some cases, dentists should follow up on a problem even when a patient, or the patient's guardian, doesn't tell the truth. In one case, a dentist noticed finger-print bruises around a seven-year-old boy's neck. The boy also flinched when the dentist approached him. But the dentist didn't contact child protective services, and four months later the boy was beaten to death by his mother's boyfriend, resulting in a suit against the dentist.
The doctor didn't report it, says Peterman, because he didn't want to get involved. Yet after searching their records, none of the panelists could find reports of a dentist being sued for referring a patient to child protective services.
A dentist's staff must be vigilant, too. Dentists can be liable for their staff's mistakes -- even for failing to act on information their staff never gave them. Dentists can likewise be held accountable for mistakes made by their partners or dentists in their employ. And, of course, a dentist can be liable for actions taken under the direction of dentist who employs them.
So where does a dentist's diagnostic responsibility end? "I definitely don't think dentists need to have patients peeing into a bottle," Tom Limoli Jr., an Atlanta insurance consultant, told DrBicuspid.com. He agreed with the panelists--the answer lies with the state board.
State dental boards lay down guidelines about diagnosis within their standards of care, and it's hard to win a suit against a doctor who has followed them faithfully. State dental associations can usually provide detailed information about these guidelines -- which now include how to respond to ailments that have nothing to do with dentistry.
What of informed consent and denial forms? "A lot of times patients don't understand what they're signing or they don't get a copy to take home," said Limoli. In these cases, the form may not provide much defense for the dentist. So when are consent and denial forms useful?
Limoli gave the example of a patient who needs an $800 root canal for a tooth that might crack without a protective crown. The patient can't afford the $1,000 for the crown, and signs an informed denial form saying he understands the risk. "If the patient comes in three or four months later and [complains that] the tooth is cracked, he won't have a leg to stand on," said Limoli. The key here? The risk to the tooth could not be determined before the root canal, so the standard of care did not dictate that the crown be put on.
Dentists looking for good consent forms and other documents should seek out The Dental Record in Wisconsin, said Limioli
But none of this matters as much as simply being careful, he said. "A dentist has to exercise plain old common horse sense. When something smells like a rat, it's a rat."

Copyright © 2007 DrBicuspid.com